Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Bjoern,

On 2012-06-19 at 11:30 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:

 http://sweetshark.livejournal.com/13298.html

gerrit is documented and ready to go. Please use it for code review as much as
possible now as it simplifies things a lot over manual patch fiddling on
mailing lists.

Can you please write down step by step commands for those who do the
manual patch fiddling on the ML how the new workflow is supposed to look
like?  Ie. how does it differ to the current

[click save as in the mailer]
git am ~/patches/0001-<hit-tab>
git log -p -1
[build if necessary]
git push
rm ~/patches/0001-<hit-tab>

?

Oehm, see the links to the wiki in the blog post?

If you answer was that the new workflow would be:

- click a link in a mail from gerrit
  - that will open the syntax-highlighted cgit-like patch in the
    browser, on a page with a big [Push it!] button + space to write the
    "Thank you" message
- I write the "Thank you" message + hit the [Push it!] button

I would be happy.  But is it going to be so?  So far the best I've got
from gerrit was clicking [Diff all unified], that opened one browser
window per file (ugh!), with more clicking to actually do the review.

Maybe the command line interface will be easier to use, but

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit/PatchReview

did not convince me that it "simplifies things a lot over manual patch
fiddling" - described in my quoted mail.  So I still hope in some better
description.

Thank you,
Kendy


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.