On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 09:21 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Fridrich Strba <fridrich.strba@graduateinstitute.ch>
wrote:
Hello, I cherry-picked with my signoff to 3-6 and 3-5. We need 2 more
people for 3-5-5
Looks OK, +1 from me -- one more still needed.
Sigh - I don't like it. In theory we can "do this right" (TM) - the
concept of just ignoring all X errors is IMHO busted and leads to bad X
programming.
OTOH - adding more XSync's at the necessary places reduces performance
I guess. If we purely used gtk+'s calls instead of hard-coding X calls
in tons of places, we wouldn't have this problem - yet fixing that is
really hard in the gtk2 code I guess.
For gtk3 this is an abomination that shouldn't be there, but ... I
guess we'll have to do this for -3-5, deeply as it sucks.
Sigh,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.