Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 09:21 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Fridrich Strba <fridrich.strba@graduateinstitute.ch> 
wrote:
Hello, I cherry-picked with my signoff to 3-6 and 3-5. We need 2 more
people for 3-5-5

Looks OK, +1 from me -- one more still needed.

        Sigh - I don't like it. In theory we can "do this right" (TM) - the
concept of just ignoring all X errors is IMHO busted and leads to bad X
programming.

        OTOH - adding more XSync's at the necessary places reduces performance
I guess. If we purely used gtk+'s calls instead of hard-coding X calls
in tons of places, we wouldn't have this problem - yet fixing that is
really hard in the gtk2 code I guess.

        For gtk3 this is an abomination that shouldn't be there, but ... I
guess we'll have to do this for -3-5, deeply as it sucks.

        Sigh,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.