On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:54:25AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Maybe the command line interface will be easier to use, but
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit/PatchReview
did not convince me that it "simplifies things a lot over manual patch
fiddling" - described in my quoted mail. So I still hope in some better
description.
Yes, I would assume that for nontrival patches using it from the command line
is the easiest workflow. You essentially do everything in git. Note also that
the exception for submitting the patch (that is pushing to fdo for now) will be
gone once gerrit "owns" the repo. Then all you do is a "gerrit review" like
everyone else. So the workflow is currently more complex than it needs to be.
The real advantage though is not sprinkling in the patches in a mailing list
and have a good status on if it is merged.
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.