On Tuesday 19 of June 2012, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:05:05PM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
The second step however does not yet work as long as gerrit does not
own the repository. Thats why it is so damn important, that everyone
gets his gerrit account set up as requested a month ago, so that we can
switch over completely.
"damn important" will not get you there, I am afraid - only explaining,
and making it no harder than the current workflow will do.
That mail one month ago was just asking to login to gerrit once and setup
your key
Which is the problem. Besides asking just to do that it should have also said
why one should do that. I'm one of the people who haven't done that,
because 'Do it because.' scores pretty low with my motivation. I wasn't
joking when I mentioned in some other mail that it would be nice if you
finally told us something about this Gerrit stuff that wasn't just a random
remark. I still have yet to see a good description of what Gerrit is actually
supposed to do for us exactly.
And while I myself decided I wouldn't bother until it comes, right now it
appears to me like nobody has been really told, and that does bother me.
-- not yet using it/playing with it (although that is appreciated
too), which is what I ask people to do now. I hope that we can switch over
to gerrit completely in another month
And I hope that this 'completely' is the daydreaming part. I'm a bit hazy on
the details (since, you know, I've just picked them up randomly here and
there), but if I understand it correctly, we are asked to move exclusively to
a different workflow with an unproven tool. In a month. And I thought it was
a running joke that this codebase breaks every single tool that's use on it.
and if there are a lot of people
suddenly "surprised" by the change(*), we might run out of smart,
unsurprised people who actually had a look at what is coming before.
Sorry, but I think you got this backwards. If we run out of smart unsurprised
people to look at what's coming, it's not coming. Simple as that. Tools are
there for people, not people for tools.
So I guess the lesson is: Be smart, dont be one of the surprised people. ;)
Quite so. Seriously.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak@suse.cz
Context
- Re: [ANN] Please use Gerrit from now on for Patch Review (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.