Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (14-12-11 22:12)
first, I am sorry for the late replay. It was another hectic day.
No problem - it's not uncommon that these are hectic times ;-) and it's
great to see the results (what you write about too, and what I see with
the beta1 :-) )
We have beta1 build at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/.
Is it being pushed to mirrors. I should get announced tomorrow. Then
people will get it from the official site
:-)
If you feel good about the beta1 build,
My feeling about it is positive. What do others think?
you could start advertizing the bug-hunting session.
It makes no sense to have it on December 16/17. Too short notice.
Otherwise, we are back on track. There should be beta2 by the end of the
following week as planed at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/3.5#3.5.0_release
OK, so we take that into account when advertising the party.
Does this answer your question?
It perfectly does. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Cor
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] QA ideas for 3.5 WAS Re: Improving the QA and Release for 3.5 (continued)
Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5 · Petr Mladek
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.