Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I asked this once on IRC but it seems to me that some people are
actually using the testtool so I figured I'd ask again to a broader
audience. Is there any interest in maintaining/cleaning up the
testtool? If not is there a way that those tests can be rewritten to
work in one of the other test suites?

August Sodora
augsod@gmail.com
(201) 280-8138



On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz> wrote:
Cor Nouws píše v Pá 11. 11. 2011 v 17:40 +0100:
Hi,

As a result of the discussions, the presentation, at the LibOCon, here
are the conclusions.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
and the places where people can comment and show commitment.

What do you think?

Some of the things are already in progress:

       + we are cleaning up QA wiki pages [1]
       + there is long discussion on the QA mailing list [2] about
         how to organize testing in Litmus [3]
       + we decided to update the schedule for 3.5.0 [4]:
               + add beta0 before one week feature freeze
               + do only beta1, beta2, beta3 with two weeks cadence


Reference:
[1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA
[2] libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
[3]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2011-November/thread.html
[4]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-November/020724.html


Best Regards,
Petr

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.