Hi *,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@suse.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 12:18 -0500, August Sodora wrote:
Is it worth salvaging the tests? Sorry for being so pushy about this
topic but I would be super happy to have the basic module contain only
language-related functionality :)
Oh - I think the general consensus is that it is almost certainly not
worth salvaging them; particularly since they run so confoundedly
slowly, the failures are hard to turn into concrete error reports, and
UI changes cause them to break anyway.
Just FYI - at apache someone rewrote testtool as a java component that
could be hooked up to junit
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3COF691F571D.57F97321-ON4825794A.0009600B-4825794A.000DDABD%40cn.ibm.com%3E
From Zhe Liu <liu...@cn.ibm.com>
Subject Anybody interested in TestTool? I wrote a Java lib to replace it.
Date Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:29:09 GMT
No idea whether that one would reuse the existing scripts or not
(doubt that there is a conversion for it).
ciao
Christian
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] QA ideas for 3.5 WAS Re: Improving the QA and Release for 3.5 (continued)
Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5 · Petr Mladek
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.