On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 12:18 -0500, August Sodora wrote:
Is it worth salvaging the tests? Sorry for being so pushy about this
topic but I would be super happy to have the basic module contain only
language-related functionality :)
        Oh - I think the general consensus is that it is almost certainly not
worth salvaging them; particularly since they run so confoundedly
slowly, the failures are hard to turn into concrete error reports, and
UI changes cause them to break anyway.
        But we should prolly make a more formal decision about them really -
and either remove them entirely in one clean sweep, or keep the hooks;
what do you plan to remove ?
        Thanks !
                Michael.
-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] QA ideas for 3.5 WAS Re: Improving the QA and Release for	3.5 (continued)
 
  Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] Improving the QA and Release for	3.5 · Petr Mladek
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.