Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian -AT- sspaeth.de>
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:39:36 +0100

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:50:24 -0700, "Tor Lillqvist" wrote:

Aren't you mixing up two orthogonal issues here? Whether to use Java when building LibreOffice, 
and whether to have and distribute parts of the LibreOffice end product requiring a Java runtime.

Isn't Java used during the build also for some *processing* of data?
(Which presumably then is optional, if it is possible to build without
Java on the build machine.)


OK, granted, I did not think of that. I thought of --enable-java as the
user-visible bits. I don't care if developers have to install this or
that to get it building.

And no, I don't have problems with premade binaries :).

Sebastian

Attachment: pgpdeMF4uYcQO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Context

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?) (continued)
- Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?) · Caolán McNamara
  - Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?) · Norbert Thiebaud
  - Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?) · Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
    - Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?) · Thorsten Behrens
- Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?) · Kevin Hunter
- [Libreoffice] de-emphasisig java ... - summary so far ... · Michael Meeks

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.