On 03/12/2010 Michael Meeks wrote:
We cannot bundle the JRE (as Oracle do)
Wouldn't it be possible to bundle a free Java implementation? I haven't
followed the status of the ongoing efforts toward a free Java recently,
but if it is stable enough and cross-platform (I heard a Mac OS X
version started to be developed last month) it could be considered.
and if the user goes
to download it, they have OpenOffice.org advertised to them.
And this should be no problem. LibreOffice should not be afraid of an
OpenOffice.org banner. And anyway most of the early adopters will likely
already know, and in many cases use, OpenOffice.org.
Regards,
Andrea.
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?) (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.