Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index 

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:

So,

      As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in
parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented
features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering:

      would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ?


That's surely a terrible idea. Now we default to building something
which isn't the same as what will realistically be deployed, Base won't
work out of box and all java extensions won't work.

C.

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.