Re: [libreoffice-design] voting on Visual Design tag

Hi Bernhard

Good point about some confusion for some shorted tags.

There has to be a balance I think in terms of brevity and identification 
while taking into account acronyms that might have dual meanings and 
having some consistency.

Might I suggest that we do something like your suggestion for ViDes but 
have 3 letters for first word and 2-3 for second word

The following and other tags could be

[VisIde]
[BraDes]
[VisDes]

and

[UsaPro] for Usability productivity
[UsaInt] for Usability Interface

Also, you are right about having a reference page somewhere for Design 
Tags - this could be for example on the first Design\WhiteBoards page.


Cheers

Phil Jackson


On 5/22/2011 8:47 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Hi Marc, all,
>
> While [UX] is quite universal understood, I want you to think (and 
> decide) about a short tag for Visual Identity / Branding Design.
> Marc mentioned the necessity for newcomers to understand the tag, but 
> I think most of us agree to keeping as much room for a descriptive 
> subject.
>
> Possible tags would be:
> [VI] for Visual Identity
> [BD] for Branding Design
> [VD] for Visual Design
> [ViDes] for Visual Design
>
> None of them are self-descriptive, but we should provide a wiki page 
> for new members where such abbreviations have to be explained 
> (together with more general information about our team).
>
> What do you like most?
> (I for one prefer [VD])
>
> Could you just add "+1" to the tag of your preference?
>
> Best regards
>
> Bernhard


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted