Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 11-02-2012 10:44, Cor Nouws wrote:
I think we must distinct between three situations/phases
1. 3.5.x must be promoted but with care
(might be 3.5.0, maybe 3.5.1 or might even be skipped)

2. 3.5.x considered good enough
for non-expert installation and use
(might be 3.5.0, maybe 3.5.1)

3. 3.5.x is simply default
(for probably 3.5.1 or 3.5.2 and up)

I believe that 3.5.0 should be advertised as the default recommended version. If it isn't ready for that, I would assume that the developers had put out another release candidate!

I think we can assume that the project will get quite some press coverage for the 3.5 release (at least more than for the 3.5.1 release). So it makes no sense to spoil that, by saying to people that it isn't quite ready after all, when they come to download the software. That will just cause confusion and insecurity.

I would think that the newest major release is for end-users and the previous major is for "enterprises" (and if they want the previous release, they will know, know why and know to look for it). But I have been confused by LibreOffice's messaging on this, even though I am a developer (not a LO-dev, just a end-user).

--
Anders

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.