On 11-02-2012 10:44, Cor Nouws wrote:
I think we must distinct between three situations/phases
1. 3.5.x must be promoted but with care
(might be 3.5.0, maybe 3.5.1 or might even be skipped)
2. 3.5.x considered good enough
for non-expert installation and use
(might be 3.5.0, maybe 3.5.1)
3. 3.5.x is simply default
(for probably 3.5.1 or 3.5.2 and up)
I believe that 3.5.0 should be advertised as the default recommended
version. If it isn't ready for that, I would assume that the developers
had put out another release candidate!
I think we can assume that the project will get quite some press
coverage for the 3.5 release (at least more than for the 3.5.1 release).
So it makes no sense to spoil that, by saying to people that it isn't
quite ready after all, when they come to download the software. That
will just cause confusion and insecurity.
I would think that the newest major release is for end-users and the
previous major is for "enterprises" (and if they want the previous
release, they will know, know why and know to look for it). But I have
been confused by LibreOffice's messaging on this, even though I am a
developer (not a LO-dev, just a end-user).
--
Anders
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-website] Improving download page (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.