Le 2011-06-21 07:14, Italo Vignoli a écrit :
On 6/20/11 1:59 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Could you point me to any page with the results of these discussions. I
seem to have missed it somehow.
We had a lot of face to face and phone discussions before the launch,
but you won't find any trace of them (other than the memory of each
participant).
Also, discussions with FSF were mostly by private email and phone, and
were supposed to clarify our position vs proprietary extensions before
FSF statement (we explained why we double license LGPLv3+ and MPL, as
MPL is not the preferred FSF license).
By the way, we use the MPL license to suit the needs of companies like
IBM who want to build a proprietary version of the software, although
US corporations have a preference for Apache License which it is not
copyleft (MPL is defined as weak copyleft).
Thanks for the explanation. I think it would be nice to have our
statement on the matter published somewhere on our website.
As for the comment of "although US corporations have a preference for
Apache License which it is not copyleft (MPL is defined as weak
copyleft)", IMO it's more of a cultural thing. We, in North America, are
used to seeing "big business" and hearing of "for-profit" philosophies
and little of "opensource" philosophy. I remember as early as the last
year and a half of hearing people say at school board IT meetings that
installing Linux on boxes was "considered illegal if MSWindows are not
installed" and my countering with the fact that I was a whitebox dealer
who sold boxes with Linux installed on it and that my sales were going
fine and were definitely not illegal, OR, also hearing from some of my
US colleagues in the educational field that "opensource is considered
un-American because there is no profit involved". This type of attitude
are chronicled in articles such as this:
[http://www.serverwatch.com/trends/article.php/3868046/Open-Source-Software-Bad-Evil-and-Un-American.htm].
This is some of the mind-set that some of us harbour in North America.
It's organization like ours and our supporting partners that will make a
difference in changing attitudes in North America.
BTW ... this is a neat article to read re: the spread of opensource
software in North America:
[http://www.serverwatch.com/trends/article.php/3868046/Open-Source-Software-Bad-Evil-and-Un-American.htm],
which brings home the importance of having LibreOffice ready for
large-scale installations. We need to make our LibreOffice more
attractive by providing administrative tools to ease large-scale
installation as well as administrative tools for managing installation
preferences remotely.
Cheers,
Marc
--
Marc Paré
http://www.parEntreprise.com
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website · drew
Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website · Rainer Bielefeld
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.