Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 21:24 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:


You could try this. But I think the issue is, that we need to handle the answers of 
the authors. The easiest answer would be "go ahead", but I think there would not only 
such easy answers from the authors. Some of them would want some information or have 
some questions. Thus we need some humans to execute this tasks ;-)

Right - well we could phrase it such that what we ask for is for them to
contact us if they have questions, and supply a 'for purpose' email
address. What is the worst that could happen, the site admin's say no
they won't do it.

Also, having the authors on board for extensions makes huge sense and
not having such would seem a show stopper to me. (hmmm, would need to
ponder that a bit more before giving a real opinion).

However for templates, if the license is good is the author's approval
absolutely necessary?

//drew


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.