Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 00:05 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 6/19/11 10:55 PM, drew wrote:

If there is to be a policy of this magnitude then the correct way is to
have a vote of the members of the foundation, not the SC or the BOD when
it exists, IMO.

I don't think that the policy is under discussion (i.e., not offering 
and not promoting proprietary extensions on TDF web properties), as it 
has been already discussed in September 2010 and quite recently, when 
TDF has been approached by FSF before their statement.

I agree - and my comments should not be construed as belief in a need to
do any of that.

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.