Good enough.
I don't have any issues with the SC decision at all. In fact, this same unequivocal reply should
have come two months ago.
As I said in my first mail, we should not be forced to second-guess the SC's intent.
Unfortunately, that is exactly what we have been doing because SC's message was not clear earlier.
For that matter, the appointment of the as website team also came as a surprise.
This was not announced through the most obvious channel (in this mail list).
The information trickled through David as part of another discussion, which is very strange.
Let us hope the organizational announcements are made more gracefully in future.
-Narayan
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:38:40 +0100
From: charles.h.schulz@gmail.com
To: website@libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-website] Re: Libreoffice.org website dev sitrep 2011-02-02 - [Was: Work on
the "Why?" pages]
Hello Narayan, everyone,
Just a reminder:
We will not consider any move to another CMS, platform, etc. until at least 6 months. At that
stage (in 6 months or so) we might/may perhaps *consider* (not necessarily approve) a move to a
platform such as Drupal.
Until that stage:
1) no discussion about Drupal on this list.
2) no "major overhaul" of the website.
What this does not mean:
1) we can't change the way some of the content is presented on the website. (see the wiki page
for this)
2) we can't improve the website in minor ways.
3) we can't fix bugs.
Yes, there comes a time when the website is "completed" and where only incremental improvements
are needed.
Again: LibreOffice is not about a website nor about letting people satisfy their passion about
web design, at least not primarily. We do not want a website that keeps on changing because
people think their way is better.
We (the SC) do not want to reopen yet another thread about these topics. The level of energy and
effort spent on this topic (the website) is ridiculously high compared to what we need to to work
on. We're therefore glad that there are people who want to help but there comes a point where
it's not helpful, because someone's always pushing, pushing and always pushing. Same thing with
respect to the website confcall: we haven't agreed on working again on overhauling the website,
we haven't agreed on changing the website team, which for the sake of clarity is composed of the
same 4 people the SC has appointed.
Thank you,
--
charles.h.schulz
Sent with Sparrow
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.