Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Italo,

When David wanted me to write the "Why" pages, my first reaction was that these pages should be 
written by the marketing team. But he wanted to finish them, so I did the job after studying how 
OOo positioned themselves.

Right from the beginning, I have repeatedly asked how LO is positioned, but never got the reply.
How is a website copywriter supposed to write without that critical insight?

And now I am in the embarrassing position of having that article revoked/reworked.

I do think your inputs should have come before I wrote those pages.

Why do SC-members have to reverse everything post-facto while remaining inert when it counts?
I don't buy this "no time" concept. You wasted my time and effort through your tardiness, and I 
don't like it.

My point to Mike was that the same points were already listed in the website, and elaborated by 

I didn't mean it was a great job; just that it was described in great (more) details.

I also gave you a detailed feedback on the logo/tagline for the website.
I hope you will have the professional courtesy to reply that mail (remember it is there on wiki 

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.