Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Le 2010-10-19 11:06, Keith Williams a écrit :

In regards to wordpress.  WOrdpress is a good system and is easy to use for
a CMS / Blog.  Its good for projects that don't need a lot of custom data
driven pages or publishing workflows that extend beyond a single person.  In
general, Wordpress is a solid system and nice because it doesn't need much
configuration.  It really doesn't "do" much in terms of what you would
expect from full featured application framework, but it is an easy to use
CMS.  I usually steer people to it that don't have many requirements.

I guess the difference is this...

Drupal is good because it's flexible and it is a full featured framework for
building lots of different applications.  For example, I'm using it now to
create a learning management system and student information system for a
charter school.  I can also use it to create a basic website, and I can use
it to create a newspaper website.  I'm also using it to create a unified
management console to manage the content on hundreds of parked domains that
someone wants to put up billboards on.

My point being... You can do a lot with it, so learning it has a lot of
advantages.  It's not going anywhere but up.  The US goverment is adopting
it for lots of .gov sites and corporate america, and higher ed are coming
along too.  I would love for something to come along that was better than
Drupal  I'm frankly sick of it in some ways, but the fact of the matter for
many types of site, it doesn't have any competition at least in the open
source market.  I'm not saying that joomla and wordpress or silverstripe are
bad, but for certain things Drupal is king.

IMHOP a project like this is a prime candidate to benefit from Drupal's
community plumbing and I think that is why I'm even talking here at this

And for god sakes, don't use a program that forces you to watch a loading
screen everytime you click on the admin site, that is simply retarded.
  Think of the poor admin that needs to maintain this and the site builders
that will click on this thing a million times, that feature sucks and seems
to indicate that tehy are hiding bad performance.

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Keith Williams<>  wrote:

Hi Keith:

Thanks for this note. I was impressed with your input until the end paragraph "And for god sakes ... performance." A little disappointed with the choice of language which does not make a good case for your arguments.

But, disregarding the language, we need now to examine the requirements of the choice of CMS according to the SC TDF page, which I seemed to have lost. I put a note on the list asking where to find the site.

We need to go through the list in a rational and methodical way. All of these argumentative posts are getting nowhere.

Let' examine the virtues of each CMS packages a little more critically and without prejudice for competing CMS package.


E-mail to for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.