Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
November 2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index 

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104052

--- Comment #28 from Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi> ---
Christoph: What would you think if somebody else (like me) (in my own time,
this is not something I do paid work for) added the data from that palette as a
built-in palette, in the source code, and thus obviously licensed using the
usual license combination. Would that be useful? Or would you still then be
afraid that somebody goes through the pain of intentionally modifying it and
building LO but still uses the same name, and redistributes such a LO?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.