Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
November 2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104052

--- Comment #29 from Christoph Schäfer <christoph-schaefer@gmx.de> ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #28)
Christoph: What would you think if somebody else (like me) (in my own time,
this is not something I do paid work for) added the data from that palette
as a built-in palette, in the source code, and thus obviously licensed using
the usual license combination. Would that be useful? Or would you still then
be afraid that somebody goes through the pain of intentionally modifying it
and building LO but still uses the same name, and redistributes such a LO?

Tor, there's no problem with your suggestion. Neither RGB nor HLC values as
such can be subjects to copyright.

Feel free to add the palette to the source code!

As I've written before, we only use ND protection to ensure the integrity of
the colour values in cross-media workflows, as well as the reliability of the
physical colour reference.

Thank you very much for your offer!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.