On 2/29/2016 4:31 AM, toki <toki.kantoor@gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/02/2016 19:06, Tanstaafl wrote:
Not sure what kind of real world scenario that falls into
That real world scenario is adhering to a lawyer's recommendation that
even de facto spam has to be retrieved and archived to comply with
assorted federal, state and local data retention laws, rules, and
regulations.
Actually, depending on the jurisdiction, I'd call B$ on that.
There is NO law that requires one to ACCEPT all mail.
First and foremost you reject mail for invalid recipients. Then there
are a lot of spam cases that can safely and legally be rejected at SMTP
time.
But, sure, if you ACCEPT the mail, then if you fall under certain laws,
you may have to archive it for a given amount of time.
But, again, in what world does anyone receive (ACCEPT) 2+GB of mail PER
HOUR?
Sorry, but that is just silly.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05 (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.