Hi Andreas and Tom,
It was good to see that someone actually responded to the question that was asked about LO. I don't
make much use of Writer so I have little but civility to contribute. I have *reflowed* your
messages as quoted below my signature.
I would think that for the casual user of Writer who mostly uses it as a text document reader like
the original poster said describes his usage of LO, it makes little difference which version of LO
The diatribe that occurred against the original poster's signature block is regrettable and in my
opinion unwarranted. While I'm convinced that Islam is in error and Christianity is true, I can
pray for the followers of Islam and for the peace of Jerusalem.
From: Tom Davies <email@example.com>
To: "Andreas Säger" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:24
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: question about the best version of libreoffice:
errr, at least wrt 3.5 - i'm not sure about trolls.
I think as a general rule the later versions of a branch tend to be more reliable in terms of their
functionality and probably more stable too (although i've never had LO out-right crash or
anything). So for the 3.5 branch the 3.5.4 was probably more stable and reliable than the 3.5.0.
With the 4.2 branch hopefully it's become smoother and more reliable with each "Service Pack", such
that 4.2.1 was a bit better, 4.2.2 quite a bit better, 4.2.3 even better and with the 4.2.5 being
nearly the best. The best version in the 4.2 branch 'should be' the 4.2.6 but sometimes branches
don't bother to go that far because the x.x.5 was plenty "good enough" (or other reasons for moving
onto a newer branch).
The advantage with newer branches 'should be' that they just have better functionality, greater
compatibility with the ever-changing MS formats. Although they are initially "stable" (using the
devs definition of the word - errr and extra-ordinarily so, especially when compared to pretty much
any other software apparently) some older functionality may have temporarily been inadvertently
broken. Hopefully the "code clean-up" has significantly reduced the amount of unexpected breakages
of completely unrelated things.
So the 4.3.6 should be about as stable and reliable as the 4.2.6 and the 4.4.6. There is not much
point in trying out the earlier releases of any branch, just skip straight to the one with the
highest 3rd digit.
However what 'should be' and "what really is" are often completely opposite from each other in so
many areas of life. So i would be fairly interested in Nasrin's opinions about how closely the
last few branches seem to have followed that "general rule", especially "with
regards to" ( = wrt ) "accessibility issues" such as screen-readers.
There is a separate mailing list for accessibility issues but it's so inactive that i doubt anyone
is still on it and it may have even been closed down a few years ago without me noticing it being
stopped. I suspect that a lot of people moved to Apache Open Office when IBM donated it's fork of
OO.o to AOO. OpenOffice is such a close relative of LibreOffice nowadays that it doesn't make a
huge difference which is being used imo.
I think the main thing creating a problem for "what should be" is Java and Base. If they can be
avoided then maybe the "general rule" is fairly valid. With either Base or Java being used then it
becomes a lot less clear, unless things have changed radically in the last couple of years.
On 20 January 2016 at 12:51, Andreas Säger <email@example.com> wrote:
Am 20.01.2016 um 13:36 schrieb Andreas Säger:
I used 3.5 for many years with no problems.
Oh, shit. Did I feed a troll?
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] question about the best version of libreoffice: · James Knott
[libreoffice-users] Re: question about the best version of libreoffice: · Andreas Säger
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy