I think there's a dangerous perception here: The perception that the LO
developers work on nothing except what they want to work on.
I didn't mean to say that.
I'm aware that some developers work on whatever is needed and fix the most
But out of 300 developers, there must be people who can fix the "boring"
bugs and the "not important" bugs... Of course you would have to ask these
developers to start with bug #1 and fix it before moving to #2
Michael Meeks once wrote "Developers don't like to be told what to do". I'm
sure they don't. But if nobody does then there is no solution for bugs that
I have pointed out in the past that you cannot expect a developer to
work on your bug, because there is nothing forcing him to work on
anything but what he wants to, but that doesn't mean that is all he
does. It means you can't *force* him to work on what *you* want him to
work on. I'm sure the developers *do* give careful consideration to
what they work on, it just might not be what you feel they should work
on, but they've got a bigger picture than you.
First, it's not *my* bug. The bug is the software. The software is not mine.
Second, many times I already have a solution for the problem. I only report
it so that the bug is fixed for the benefit of the community. I even report
bugs that don't affect me at all.
Third, "there is nothing forcing him to work on anything but what he wants
to" is exactly the problem IMO.
Remember, we do have to keep the developers happy to some extent,
otherwise they leave.
Yes, so do other people. But they are not so important, right?
If you can't tell developers what to do, some bugs will always be there
because they are boring to fix or because they are "not important".
I'm suggesting that a compromise based volunteer model is applied to all,
not just to developers. Then you might start to see a change and a real
View this message in context:
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging users: initial results of the survey (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy