Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi :)
You don't need to do all that typing anyway.  Just press the tab key a few times and the terminal 
cleverly works out what you are aiming for.  It takes a bit of working out how it works at first 
but it's a real boon once you get used to it.  Renaming is not a bad idea though as it clarifies 
exactly what is what.

I thnk it inspired those old mobile phones that had "predictive texting" waaaay before smart-phones 
arrived.  Hmmm, thinking about it i wonder what OS they were running! ;)  Unfortunately the phones 
version of predictive text was quite a bit different and a bit of a pita for a lot of people.  
Dunno how often my phone called my best buddy a cow!  

This has beena  great thread!  Thanks all :)  It's given me a lot to try out.
Regards from
Tom :)  

From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P <>
Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013, 3:27
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

I do not like all that typing.

What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived file and unarchive it.  
Then I take the folder that is created and rename it to Lib or LibO.  That way you do not need to 
type all of the characters of the folder's name.  I also do not use the desktop as the "storage" 
place fore the unarchived folder[s].

I keep forgetting the "remove" command so I use the package manager to remove the LO packages from 
the previous version that was installed.  Works well for me.

Also, I tend to use the "cd" command to go to the proper folder[s] where the "dpkg" command is 
needed.  Long ago, in my mainframe days, I was taught to go to the folder[s] where my files are to 
run them.  That is what I try to do.  The only time I do not is when I have a launcher icon to 
work with on my desktop.  I prefer to use the GUI more than the terminal anyways.  Easier on my 
fingers and my typing skills after 3 strokes.  So I do things as easy as I can, or easy as I can 
remember to do/use.

On 02/10/2013 01:06 PM, Don Myers wrote:

I used the following instructions to upgrade to LibreOffice on three machines with 
Ubuntu 12.10. It has worked really well so far. No issues installing or using it. The bug that 
made some functions in Base run unacceptably slow have been fixed!!!!!!!

*Instructions for the 64 Bit Debian Version:*
Download LibreOffice_4.0.0.3 to the desktop.
Right click on it and extract it to the desktop. This will give you the folder 
Run the following terminal commands to install it:
1. sudo apt-get remove libreoffice*.*
2. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/*.deb
3. sudo dpkg -i 
4. If using Unity, Open Dash, type Libre and you will see the different components (Writer, 
Calc, etc.). Simply drag the icons for them over to where you wish to have them in the launcher 

If you install it in this manner using the official Document Foundation version, and you type 
libreoffice in the command line, I get the following:
The program 'libreoffice' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing:
sudo apt-get install libreoffice-common
An install as shown above does not have any repository from which it originated. Therefore there 
aren't any updates, which I understand. If it showed up as an installed program, Ubuntu would 
try to update the LibreOffice with its own version which would lead to a royal mess!!!!!! I did 
not get a message saying there is a missing package like you did.


On 02/10/2013 09:59 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

I ram the install on Linux Mint 14 and had no troubles with it.

On 02/09/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I downloaded the .Deb for Ubuntu (and others) twice yday and tried
installing it as per instructions but when i tried running LibreOffice
from the command-line by typing in


I got an error message saying that LibreOffice couldn't run because i was missing a package 
called something like


when i looked through all the packages in the Deb and desktop integration
folders i found there was one!  I'm sure it's been there in previous
releases?!  However when i double-click on a docX or odt or anything
then LibreOffice 4 does successfully open it.

So, it's a bit weird but doesn't seem to be problem unless i try that odd
way of opening LO in a way that i would never normally have tried unless i wanted to try to 
collect error reports and stuff (ie never).

Regards from
Tom :)

-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.