Re: [libreoffice-users] ... not working ...

On 10/17/2012 06:29 PM, anne-ology wrote:
>         ... Thanks  :-)
>                maybe now more will realize what we're saying   ;-)

This is simply unrealistic. For anyone who has any experience with 
programming this would be known. No offense but with a ratio of 
100,000:1 or more users to developers, the idea that we would just 
squash all bugs and stop releasing new versions isn't realistic at all 
and thus why developers wouldn't respond to this recommendation. If you 
want to help I suggest taking some C++ classes and getting involved with 
the code. Most of us are volunteers who do this with our spare time, I 
hope you all keep that in mind


Regards,
Joel
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Pertti Rönnberg <ptjr@elisanet.fi> wrote:
>
> BRAVO Anne-Ology!!
> > Exactly that message - only in other words -- I have repeatedly tried to
> > tell to the LibO-experts (devs) since January:
> > they must take a brake in developing and take a certain version (e.g.
> > 3.4.xx) and make every module of the suite - Base included - absolutely
> > free of bugs and inconsistencies both in programming and the instructions
> > and especially the LibO-Help.
> > Every feature shall have a clear explanation and a detailed guiding how-to
> > in the LibO-Help -- easily understood by any average non-expert user.
> >
> > Obviously I've been crying in vain because I have not noticed any
> > (re)actions -- the developing of new versions is continuing with the result
> > of an increasing activity on this list.
> >
> > I have LibO3.4.6 installed (Win7) but avoid using it (Calc, Base) because
> > I have better to do than struggle with problems.
> > I would like to know which LibO version for the time being can be
> > considered as the most reliable and productive -- especially regarding Base.
> > It would also be interesting to see an (valid) evaluation of that reliable
> > usability on a scale 1-10 for each of the the different modules of versions
> > 3.4.xx, 3.5.xx.x, 3.6.xx.x
> > Pertti Rönnberg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 16.10.2012 18:15, anne-ology wrote:
> >
> > >          This is the reason I have no intention of updating from 3.4 until
> > > ALL these bugs are worked out -
> > >               then I'll update to 3.5; yes, I'll always be behind BUT I
> > > don't
> > > have the hassles of these bugs  ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:22 AM, teatimest <teatimest@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've been using v3.4 of LibreOffice. I updated to v3.6.2.2 and now the
> > >
> > > > contents of documents are not indexed for search.
> > > >
> > > > I'm using 64-bit Windows 7. The extension odt is checked for the indexing
> > > > option. I also checked the "Index Properties and File Contents" in the
> > > > Indexing Option in Windows.
> > > >
> > > > When I search, doc files and ppt files appears in the result but not odt
> > > > and
> > > > odp.
> > > >
> > > > Is it just me or is this known bug? The same thing happened when I
> > > > updated
> > > > to v3.5 so I went back to v3.4 for the searchability. Is there any
> > > > workaround?
> > > >
> > > > Tea


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted