Re: [libreoffice-users] ... not working ...

On 10/18/2012 01:08 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 06:29 PM, anne-ology wrote:
> >         ... Thanks  :-)
> >                maybe now more will realize what we're saying ;-)
>
> This is simply unrealistic. For anyone who has any experience with 
> programming this would be known. No offense but with a ratio of 
> 100,000:1 or more users to developers, the idea that we would just 
> squash all bugs and stop releasing new versions isn't realistic at all 
> and thus why developers wouldn't respond to this recommendation. If 
> you want to help I suggest taking some C++ classes and getting 
> involved with the code. Most of us are volunteers who do this with our 
> spare time, I hope you all keep that in mind
>
>
> Regards,
> Joel
Another problem for all programs in wide release is wide hardware 
variability in the Windows and Linux worlds especially when compared to 
Macs. There could be a very odd hardware/driver interaction that was 
never discovered in alpha, beta, or release candidate previews with 
specific hardware combinations.
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Pertti Rönnberg <ptjr@elisanet.fi> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > BRAVO Anne-Ology!!
> > > Exactly that message - only in other words -- I have repeatedly 
> > > tried to
> > > tell to the LibO-experts (devs) since January:
> > > they must take a brake in developing and take a certain version (e.g.
> > > 3.4.xx) and make every module of the suite - Base included - absolutely
> > > free of bugs and inconsistencies both in programming and the 
> > > instructions
> > > and especially the LibO-Help.
> > > Every feature shall have a clear explanation and a detailed guiding 
> > > how-to
> > > in the LibO-Help -- easily understood by any average non-expert user.
> > >
> > > Obviously I've been crying in vain because I have not noticed any
> > > (re)actions -- the developing of new versions is continuing with the 
> > > result
> > > of an increasing activity on this list.
> > >
> > > I have LibO3.4.6 installed (Win7) but avoid using it (Calc, Base) 
> > > because
> > > I have better to do than struggle with problems.
> > > I would like to know which LibO version for the time being can be
> > > considered as the most reliable and productive -- especially 
> > > regarding Base.
> > > It would also be interesting to see an (valid) evaluation of that 
> > > reliable
> > > usability on a scale 1-10 for each of the the different modules of 
> > > versions
> > > 3.4.xx, 3.5.xx.x, 3.6.xx.x
> > > Pertti Rönnberg
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 16.10.2012 18:15, anne-ology wrote:
> > >
> > > >          This is the reason I have no intention of updating from 
> > > > 3.4 until
> > > > ALL these bugs are worked out -
> > > >               then I'll update to 3.5; yes, I'll always be behind 
> > > > BUT I
> > > > don't
> > > > have the hassles of these bugs  ;-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:22 AM, teatimest <teatimest@gmail.com> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've been using v3.4 of LibreOffice. I updated to v3.6.2.2 and now the
> > > >
> > > > > contents of documents are not indexed for search.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using 64-bit Windows 7. The extension odt is checked for the 
> > > > > indexing
> > > > > option. I also checked the "Index Properties and File Contents" in 
> > > > > the
> > > > > Indexing Option in Windows.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I search, doc files and ppt files appears in the result but 
> > > > > not odt
> > > > > and
> > > > > odp.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it just me or is this known bug? The same thing happened when I
> > > > > updated
> > > > > to v3.5 so I went back to v3.4 for the searchability. Is there any
> > > > > workaround?
> > > > >
> > > > > Tea


--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted