On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Tom Davies wrote:
The question is not about wrong or right imo, it's about whether we
want new people to start using LO and to feel welcome or do we want
to discourage all newcomers?
don't assume most new-comers are not familiar with mailing lists. some
aren't but many already have ideas of etiquette.
anyway, I find some of the top-posts here too laborious to read. they
open with a comment that makes no sense so I have to scroll down
through a string of messages to find what they are responding to.
even then I might not know since people often don't snip out bits that
are irrelevant to their reply so it's hard to tell what the reply
I just end up deleting a lot of top-posters' messages.
anyway, this is a separate discussion, a good example of 'thread
drift'. I have altered the subject-line correspondingly.
I think people should mostly bottom-post and do inline comments though
if the original post and the reply are very short, no harm in
top-posting (especially the 'heads up' one-liners).
no way to enforce preferences one way or the other but the exchange of
views can be instructive or entertaining except for the dogmatists'.
One of the greatest pains to human nature is the pain of a new idea. -- Bagehot
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy