Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I find your attitude towards discussion worth a respect. I wish everyone would 
do as you do.

I think we agree in most of points.

I would only like to comment this part:

On 07/08/2012 at 18:58, Felmon Davis <> wrote:

I find this an absurd criterion of proof. there are plenty of proofs
of things I do not understand, for instance in math physics or fluid
dynamics, but that doesn't imply they are not proofs!

But, honestly, I fear that providing accurate explanation in English is beyond 
me at the moment. We would need to go into basics of methodology history and 
theories, as well as philosophical concepts behind them. After that, I think 
you could agree with me. But explaining is not only difficult for me, it would 
also be awfully off the list topic.

Therefore, I hope you do agree that we should end this discussion here.
Best regards
Mirosław Zalewski

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.