On 4/18/12 10:05 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Interestingly apparently many US government agencies and departments use Gnu&Linux for most
of their server-side and infra-structure but had to cave into users demands for MS on their
desktops.
MS has always been the choice for the OS in almost all cases, AFAIK, but
the actual programs used varied widely years ago. My agency generally
preferred Word Perfect as the word processor, but when (I think) a
government wide survey was taken as to an across the board single word
processing program to aid document sharing, WP lost out to Word. Lots
of unhappy people in my agency who had to redo all their macros,
templates, etc.
That surprises me not as far as the servers go. It seems the general
impression of US Fed employees is they are, in general, not terribly
bright in a lot of areas, where my experience is just the opposite.
Especially the tech guys. They are well aware of the advantages of Linux.
The agency I worked for didn't use Linux on any servers, AFAIK. Not
because they may not have wanted to, but the support load the tech
people had to provide so far exceeded their abilities to do a good job,
they were always making decisions in a direction of having everything
the same, to at least try to give everyone the help they needed.
The problem, despite the big government hoopla, is there's just not
enough human beings to do the job well for the tasks assigned. (Not
going into the question of efficient operations, etc, as much of that is
caused by people outside individual agencies, not the average employee.)
The average employee is prevented, intentionally, from having anything
more to do with the servers other than using them to store their data
on. I was a supervisor, and I was at my last unit for 5 years before I
even knew I could do that. No one bothered to tell me I actually had
access to the server's hard drives for file storage. Our unit didn't
even have a dedicated IT position, it fell to the administrative officer
(total department personnel size of 1) as one of many collaborative
duties, and when he passed away, it was given to me as a similar
collaborative duty. I was Chief of Maintenance (total dept. size of 3),
as well as Environmental officer, Safety Officer, Fleet Manager, and I
don't remember what else.
--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.6.8
Firefox 11.0
Thunderbird 11.0.1
LibreOffice 3.5.1.2
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] beware of the m$ subsidiary (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.