On 11/18/2011 09:13 AM, Martin Jungowski wrote:
Pedro, thank you. The problem is that as an enterprise that sees IT as tertiary means of production (as opposed to technology-driven enterprises such as Google or Microsoft) we're extremely conservative when it comes to software. The latest and greatest is never our first choice, and features are a distant fourth to stability, reliability, and dependability. Right now I'm leaning towards the well-established and therefore more stable 3.3 release tomsave myself the hassle of new features and thus also new bugs.3.4.X is better at handling MSO msox formats than 3.3.X. Because external users may send say a docx or xslx file to your users I recommend using 3.4.3/4. Both are lines are considered ready for enterprise users - 3.4.X since 3.4.3.Is there a simple comparison between 3.3 and 3.4 that shows what 3.4 is capable of that 3.3 isn't? Maybe there's something we really need but don't know yet. Something that'd be worth the extra work and effort necessary to deploy 3.4 instead of 3.3? Right now it's more like a clusterf*ck of two separate feature sets with no easy way of comparison.Thanks, Martin
-- Jay Lozier jslozier@gmail.com -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted