Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Pedro, thank you. The problem is that as an enterprise that sees IT as tertiary means of production (as opposed to technology-driven enterprises such as Google or Microsoft) we're extremely conservative when it comes to software. The latest and greatest is never our first choice, and features are a distant fourth to stability, reliability, and dependability. Right now I'm leaning towards the well-established and therefore more stable 3.3 release tomsave myself the hassle of new features and thus also new bugs.

Is there a simple comparison between 3.3 and 3.4 that shows what 3.4 is capable of that 3.3 isn't? Maybe there's something we really need but don't know yet. Something that'd be worth the extra work and effort necessary to deploy 3.4 instead of 3.3? Right now it's more like a clusterf*ck of two separate feature sets with no easy way of comparison.

Thanks,
 Martin

--
Rieke Computersysteme GmbH
Hellerholz 5
D-82061 Neuried

HRB Muenchen 73617



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.