Hi :)
I think everyone on this list, even a fresh & 'clueless' noob, is in the top 10%. The very fact of
knowing about and trying LibreOffice puts people in a very exclusive top percentage of office
'geeks'.
Apparently it would not be trivial to remove features and make add-ons/extensions to add back
that functionality if required. Even on low-spec machines there probably wouldn't be a dramatic
increase in performance and it might complicate things too much.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sun, 18/9/11, Tim Deaton <tim@timdeaton.org> wrote:
From: Tim Deaton <tim@timdeaton.org>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: docx format troubles
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Sunday, 18 September, 2011, 3:13
It's very true that 80% of people only use 20% of the program. The
problem is that my 20% is not your 20%. Now, if you could do in-depth
tracking of thousands of random users, you might be able to isolate a
certain set of features that almost nobody uses. Then those features
could be removed if doing so would make enough difference (in
performance or in resources used) to make it worth the effort.
-- Tim Deaton
On 9/17/2011 8:40 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I really like that idea a lot but i have been told it's unfeasable. Even if we could clearly
identify that 20% it would be tricky to slim the apps down that way.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sat, 17/9/11, David B Teague sr<davidbteague@comporium.net> wrote:
From: David B Teague sr<davidbteague@comporium.net>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: docx format troubles
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Saturday, 17 September, 2011, 13:30
On 9/16/2011 6:56 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
If you were able to ring-fence about 20% of the features of MS Office then about 80% of users
never stray outside that. From what i see it's more like about 100% of users. Most users don't
even use all of that 20%.
I hope this isn't hijacking the thread, and if so, /please /say so, and I'll repost this in a new
thread.
The fact that 20% of the features of MS Office (and by implication, LO and OO.o) used almost
exclusively by some 80% of the users suggests to me that OO.o should identify that 20% of
features and modularize OO.o or LO or what have you to include that 20% and make the other 80% of
the features available as extensions.
I'd like comments on this idea.
David Teague
-- nil significat nisi oscillat
-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-users] docx format troubles · e-letter
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.