Hi :)
No, that is the point i am disagreeing with. If Gnu&Linux, Bsd and other
Unix-based OSes were equally vulnerable then we would see a lot more servers
being compromised. Affecting several thousand servers would have a vastly
higher impact then affecting that many desktops wouldn't it? So, why bother
with desktops if servers are just as vulnerable? For the same effort more data
could be collected and more disruption could be caused by aiming at servers. So
why bother with creating malware for desktops at all? When not just target
servers?
Compare with other sorts of crime. Imagine no corporate crime, no fraud, no
scams just about 50%-20% of everyone getting mugged for loose change on the way
home a couple of times a year. It's low hanging fruit but just not worth the
investment of time and effort so people go for bigger targets to get more cash.
Why doesn't this happen with malware? Why not several thousand servers instead
of just desktops?
Regards from
Tom :)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.