Hi :)
Yes, Rtf is an excellent format. It would be more useful tho if MS Office
followed their own specs but then we wouldn't be having this discussion. At the
rate things are going the only organisation that doesn't follow MS specs for rtf
and docX will be MS themselves.
Our devs pour a ton of work into finding out what is really being used perhaps
by reverse engineering (?) and then developing an answer. MS devs can then
tweak just 1 or 2 tiny things quite quickly and leave it to other people to
guess at what's changed. It's not really a "dirty trick" it's a legitimate
business strategy.
Proprietary formats are about being secretive, hiding behind intellectual
copyright, hiding corporate secrets to help keep the competitive advantage.
Open Document Formats are about being honest and open about what the formats are
so that everyone can incorporate them easily and be certain that everyone else
can easily follow the standard.
MS has chosen to ignore the new Open Document Formats (version 1.2) and use the
old formats (versions 1.0 or 1.1). So they appear to be following ODF and can
legitimately publicly state that. But of course they have carefully made sure
that newer odfs still get a little messed up in MSO. Everyone else apps can
read them perfectly. Again, it's not a "dirty trick" but does make a lot of
sense as a legitimate business strategy.
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: planas <jslozier@gmail.com>
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thu, 30 June, 2011 15:22:32
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: RTF support
Hi
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 06:33 -0700, tracey002 wrote:
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
Since then I always make sure no RTF files comes near me ever.
I have all due respect for your opinion and choice and I am glad you have
the option to do that.
I had never thought of saving all documents in RTF (maybe not a bad idea),
but I do find RTF very useful for the purpose for which it was designed:
portability.
I have used RTF to send Documents and Data/Reports to recipients with
diverse Office-Applications that did NOT have a choice with the
Office-Application they were using (so I have successfully used RTF for
portability).
Sean Burke in RTF Pocket Guide wrote:
For no really good reason, support for these RTF character sets is
perfiect in some word processors, almost perfect in others..., and shoddy
in others...
The capability of applications that state or imply RTF functionality is not
a reflection of RTF, but on the competence (hence professionalism) of the
developers that implement the Open/Import and Save-As/Export routines.
This is true of *all* software: that includes the Microsoft Word Veiwer 2003
that has problems correctly displaying the Word2002RTFSpec.doc.
Just FYI, Tracey
I normally do NOT use a screw driver as a substitute for a hammer, but I
have used a heavy duty screw driver to pound the lid back on a paint can.
I am not upset that screwdrivers are not hammers.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RTF-support-tp3114703p3121621.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
One problem with RTF is MS has different versions of the specification,
generally released when a new version of MSO comes out. If your software
does not read the newer versions, which I believe is the default for the
latest MSO version you may get garbled importing on occasion.
--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: RTF support · Johnny Rosenberg
[libreoffice-users] Re: RTF support · tracey002
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: RTF support · Nuno J. Silva
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: RTF support · Nuno J. Silva
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.