Good morning, MR ZenWiz,
Do the words "Edit your replies to leave out what isn't relevant" mean
anything in this discussion?
:-) At midnight, and dead on my feet, I wasn't really interested in editing
anything other than my own text.
A related point is, sometimes when you edit someone else's writings, new
readers can come away with a misunderstanding, or even a lack of knowledge,
especially if they do not take the time to read the original post. I know
when I wrote my reply to Bob Holtzman, I had to scroll back and see exactly
what ws in my original post.
You do know that this stuff is all archived and therefore need NOT be
included in every single reply, right?
I do, and that is a good thing. Censorship, or "constructive editing", or
whatever you may wish to call it, can be a dangerous route to go, depending
on the subject.
A case in point, for those who are not US citizens, and ever for those that
are...
Our House of Representatives made a point (and I'm not sure "point" is the
correct word here) to read the US Constitution at the opening of the new
legislative session. But, they took the route of "selective editing" of the
Constitution, and read only certain parts. Only the portions of the
Constitution that are in effect were read, they did not include the portions
that had been changed or deleted. The negative result is, someone in
another country and sadly even some of our own citizens, could come a way
with a complete misunderstanding of what the original document and its
creators actually said and intended to say. It left out a very valuable
part of our history.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ken Springer
"All progress depends upon the unreasonable person."
George Bernard Shaw
Cheap prices make for cheap goods; cheap goods make for
cheap men; and cheap men make for a cheap country!"
President William McKinley
http://www.greeleynet.com/~wordwork/airpage.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Ken Springer
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · toki
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Tom Davies
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Ken Springer
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Ken Springer
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Sigrid Carrera
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Ken Springer
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Luuk
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · MR ZenWiz
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Robert Holtzman
Re: [OT]<F6>[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Robert Holtzman
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.