On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Fabian Rodriguez
<magicfab@member.fsf.org> wrote:
The FSF campaign focuses on free software supports ODF and
specifically encourages to reject *any* documents created with
Microsoft and iWork:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument/reject
No mention anywhere of any advantages of ODF being supported by
"popular" non-free software, whatever that may mean.
Yes, that's a bit unfortunate omission from the site. The entry was
posted in 2011, so I can understand how it might be a bit out of date
and not reflect the current capabilities of modern version of
MS-Office. That being said, I think the FSF will still be reticent to
promote the use of MS-Office under its current licensing scheme.
This is precisely why I think we should split-up the campaigns, so the
FSF can continue to say "Please use ODF + Free Software," and an
interoperability group can say "Please use ODF for interchange."
--R
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.