Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Hi :)
If we were to target certain companies to try to "get them onboard" with
ODF then it might be good to start with our own "supporters".  Low hanging
fruit should be easier, right?  Google-docs doesn't allow people to use
ODF!!  Actually i think ODF usage has improved quite a bit now that MS
Office supports it.  It's really odd to have Google as one of the remaining
barriers!

I am not the biggest fan of Google, but in all fairness ODF is supported
by Google. You can open and edit ODT files. And ODS files.
As for ODP files I can't comment I never made slides on Google, I prefer
Impress.



I think quite a few people do "Ask websites that provide editable files in
Word/Excel/PowerPoint to alternately or additionally provide versions in an
ODF format." and it might be good to let such people know that there are
groups they could join that might help them be more effective.  OASIS and
the FSF are 2 such organisations that would be great to promote to TDF's
mailing lists.  An announcement now might build-up momentum.  The timing
would be about perfect right now.

FSF supports LibreOffice as a free software, so it would be great.
OASIS is the backer of the OpenDocument Format (I prefer to use the long
name).


Regards from
Tom :)



Other notes:
Other efforts can be done with governments.
For example NATO has adopted ODF as an international file standard, but not
all member countries have this standard themselves.
ODF is also ISO.


Cheers from Montreal
Immanuel








________________________________
From: Charles-H. Schulz <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2013, 9:59
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Campaign for ODF file formats?


Hello Robinson,

Le Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:29:10 -0400,
Robinson Tryon <bishop.robinson@gmail.com> a écrit :

The PDF Readers campaign[1] recently contacted LibreOffice and asked
us to promote the use of Free Software readers for PDF file formats.
We had a brief discussion[2] on the website mailing list, and I had
the idea that it might be helpful for LibreOffice if we or the FSFE
ran a similar campaign for ODF.

There are several directions such a campaign could take; here are some
of my first thoughts:

1) Promote the use of standardized icons for ODF files, both when
listing files for download, or when listing system
capabilities/allowed upload formats.

(Question: Is there a standardized set of icons for ODF files?)


There was a big debate a long time ago and the answer was that it would
not really work.


2) Promote the use of Free Software for reading/writing ODF file
formats.


I assume you're familiar with the Document Freedom Day? We participate
to it too. But at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, we promote
the use of open standards and ODF, however, promoting the use of Free
Software for ODF file goes exactly against the initial purpose: open
standards are open to everyone, even proprietary software. That's their
value and their importance.


3) Ask websites that provide ODF files to link to our list of
ODF-compatible Free Software.

our list --> you may rather want to have them link to the wikipedia
entry on ODF.


Following the concept of the PDF Readers campaign, we could get a
domain like 'odf-software.org' and provide HTML and campaign
badges/icons to make it trivial to link to the site.


Yes, but.... why should it be up to us? It could be up to the OASIS
Consortium and other movements to take care of that.  I sound reluctant
here not because I'm not interested but because it's very important to
realize that we are an implementor of ODF. ODF as such is vendor
neutral and while we ought to push the use of  ODF we cannot "take
over" the promotion of ODF.

4) Ask websites that provide editable files in Word/Excel/PowerPoint
to alternately or additionally provide versions in an ODF format.


Preaching to the choir :-) Actually Wikipedia / Wikimedia already
provide the ability to create ODF documents based on a collection of
articles.

Best,

Charles.




Cheers,
--R

[1] http://pdfreaders.org/
[2] http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/msg11433.html




--
Charles-H. Schulz
Co-founder & Director, The Document Foundation,
Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
Mobile Number: +33 (0)6 98 65 54 24.

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.