Hi :)
There is a lot of extreme emotion about this area. BrOffice seems to have been
excellent for many years, gained a good reputation, good people and did great
work. Inevitably any large community will have misunderstandings and different
people heading in different directions but all believing they are doing the best
for the whole community.
Sometimes people are too enthusiastic and haven't noticed what already exists or
how their ideas might already be being implemented. I think it's best to guide
people into what is already going on so that they can channel their enthusiasm
in a positive direction. The post that sparked this controversy was clearly not
written in the person native language so the misunderstanding should be easier
to clarify on Brazilian lists.
Most of the good stuff about BrOffice seems to have merged into the wider
community here at TDF in the LibreOffice community. It has enriched the wider
community considerably. Most of the good people are here now, and the
structures, websites, the passion and so on. It does still retain a unique
identity even if the name has changed. It's influencing the wider community too
now :)
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: "luizheli@gmail.com" <luizheli@gmail.com>
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wed, 15 June, 2011 0:53:11
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Magazine LibreOffice International.
I'll try to explain. Once again we are faced with an issue which is not
applicable to the TDF and marketing list. This a internal question. Although
I do not believe that TDF is so alienated.
Did not take the death of BrOffice.org. That still leaves the death of the
BrOffice magazine and any semblance of this ill-fated brand. I did not
believe it would come back, but came back! I end my participation here this
theme because I believe the list does not deserve this kind of discussion.
"Brazil, show your face .."
Rgds,
Luiz Oliveira
2011/6/14 Italo Vignoli <italo.vignoli@gmail.com>
On 6/14/11 11:31 PM, luizheli@gmail.com wrote:
Something tells me there are more unspoken intentions behind this naive
message.
I simply consider a global magazine a difficult project, but I cannot see
any unspoken intentions behind it.
In my opinion, a free software project should have a generally positive
attitude vs new proposals.
Maybe, you should clarify which are your unspoken intentions, as your
message is clearly hiding something.
Best regards.
--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vignoli@gmail.com
mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP +39.02.320621813
skype italovignoli
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.