On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 14:20 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Drew
Le 2011-05-24 11:26, drew a écrit :
Hi,
Alright, I really thought this was a subject worth a flyer (brochure) so
took another pass and this time pushed it to the wiki, not close to done
- NEED lots of feedback form everyone..I think it should make sense as
to what the subject is..
I've added the text, mostly unchanged, from Italo's blog post on the
timed release model - BTW.
Hi Marc, et al
Pushed new copies to the wiki just now
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibO-Pamphlet-platforms-support.pdf
or for the ODF file...
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibO-Pamphlet-platforms-support.odt
Nice! Here are my comments:
Maybe in p.1 panel 1 "Operating System Distributions - User
Supported->To name but a few" we could add something like "Check your
distribution packager for native availability of LibreOffice" or
something like this. Or some statement that LibreOffice may be already
available through user's distro packager.
missed that one in this drop...
BTW ... I would probably move p.1 panel 2 to p.2 panel 2. Reason: p.2
panel 1 lists the modules, so, it would seem to make sense to then have
the modules' description on the very next panel.
Likely correct, but I would go further - the entire flow is, IMO,
off...but didn't address that this go around.
p.1 panel 1 ... bottom. Is there anyway to fade the motif a little more?
I find reading the text a little difficult to read.
Done
p.1 panel 1 ... the titles are off-set on the left-hand from the regular
text but not the same on all of the pamphlet. I prefer the left-flush
look rather than off-setting the titles. I think it looks more
professional. Just my take.
Done - oddest thing, then the body text slid a little to the right...huh
*smile*
BTW ... I am not sure if I like the dark black outline around the
letters in the titles. It looks like a try at 3-D but the effect is not
working. I like the look of a softer line such as the LibreOffice tm on
p.1 panel 3.
OK -
p. 2 panel 2 ... small correction: "LibreOffice is thez" <-- remove the
"z". Also the Libre in "LibreOffice" is larger than "office"
thanks
p. 2 panel 2 ... I like the "LibreOffice uses a time based release
schedule" ... maybe shorten up the title to "LibreOffice Time Based
Release Schedule". I would also steer away from mentioning OOo. There is
no need to do this anymore. OOo is no longer a consideration and most
people will have had no idea that OOo was not on a time base release
schedule. Better, if we could provide a windows software example being
developed on a "time based release schedule" (I don't know if Firefox or
Chrome fit this ... I think Firefox does) -- KDE and Gnome really don't
mean anything to our Windows users which are the majority of our users.
re-worded for this..see the first three paragraphs in that section for
changes
//drew
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.