Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi

Em 11-05-2011 09:28, Paulo de Souza Lima escreveu:
> 2011/5/11 Charles-H. Schulz<charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>
>
>> I hope you understand the difference better now. Also, I would like, >> as another general comment, to remind you and everyone that Claudio
>> is also part of the core team of TDF. I am surprised that he hasn't
>> been more active on this particular topic. That's just my feeling,
>> perhaps I'm wrong.
>
> I am also surprised about the lack of participation of Olivier in this
> discussion. Claudio has his own personal problems and I can't speak
> for him.

Really i am out by personal problems.

But in other hand, i tried to alert in core@ list what happens here some months ago, and at final was a talk with some members of SC, without a conclusive feedback about this. However, going direct to point.

* Domains *
As Luiz told, i am talking with Florian about the domains.
I already request to redirect www.tdf.org.br -> www.tdf.org, and this question will be finished soon.

The lib.o.br, was a thing that we discussed inside of our lists, because the broffice.org page is a *well know* in Brazil. Other thing is that we has different things inside of our page, like news about ODF/BrO/LibO, migrations, documentation and many other things, but is clear now that for TDF is not (more) interesting the BrOffice and its history.

* Migration *
As already was explained by Paulo, Luiz and others, we are migrating to wiki and SilverStripe, but is many content. Was only a job of 5 years in marketing that resulted in a installed base around 15M of desktops with Br/LibO in our country. But, ok. We will drop any idea of migration and point all to there and maintain the BrOffice.org yet. A curiosity about this point is that we have all other brazilian domains of each project, like mozilla.org.br and postgresql.org.br, working fine with the international projects, without problems, and with the respectively recognition of international institution or projects, like Mozilla Foundation and PostgreSQL.

* Official and not official logos *
About the "warning" in the redirect page in BrOffice.org, we are talking about the product. If you remember, before of 3.3.4 was "BrOffice", and now "LibreOffice". The brands are correct. About the logo in the main page without "The Document Foundation", in the rules[1] say that for "non-official" use is to use the "LibreOffice" without the "TDF".
[1]http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Logo_Policy

A strategy that did the difference here and that some neighboring countries are looking our (old!) model maybe is not more interesting.

My two cents...

Claudio

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.