Joey,
Contest work well with artistic content. What is important is to communicate
the desired outcome and the process for participating. A wiki page will
often do.
This adds value in two ways.
1) A little planning never hurts and having a well defined criteria for
selecting the successful candidate is good.
2) Re-enforces to the Participants the playing field is level and everyone
has a shot.
Reminding folks how this is a personal benefit often boosts participation.
John
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Johannes Bausch
<johannes.bausch@gmail.com>wrote:
And when we're at it: Can we sit down and make a LibO logo contest?
With a deadline? I suggest the following:
1) Have a contest for a general mockup, this includes
* Logo symbol
* Logo text (see issue I already mentioned, we need the text path to
be refined somehow)
* Icons for files and applications
* (Mascot)
The deadline for this part should be something like in two weeks or
so, mainly because we already have so many great ideas but they're
somehow spread a bit too far away. Then we decide upon the general
elements. Paper plane or book as symbol (just examples), which logo
text etc. will all be decided by vote. I'm not sure how that can be
done on a mailing list but I'm sure someone of you has an idea for
that.
2) Have an actual logo contest
Now that we have the elements, we want the people to make great
artwork out of it. This includes the same things as before:
* Logo, different versions (color, grayscale, black, inverted),
different formats (small, square?, only symbol)
* Icons
The deadline for this second part should be something like two further
weeks along. We could also attract more artists in participating here
- I think it is not bad for your reputation as an artist if YOUR logo
is being used in such an application.
I'd really appreciate some feedback on these ideas of mine. If you
think this is a good idea I can set up a wiki page with the
guidelines.
Thanks,
Joey
2010/11/12 Johannes Bausch <johannes.bausch@gmail.com>:
By the way: can I rename files on the wiki? "Logo.svg" is not really
self-descriptive and I just noticed it after having uploaded the file.
Thanks.
2010/11/12 Johannes Bausch <johannes.bausch@gmail.com>:
Hey,
I see no general problem with the current logo. However, just using a
font, typing a name and saying "this is my logo" is not the way logos
are done, usually at least. I know we're just at the beginning but
still I felt like doing some enhancements. So here we are:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Logo.svg
I've changed several things:
* ffi ligature
* raised the lower line of both c and e
* reduced and evened space between letters
* fixed base line
* fixed weird bend on e
I know, it's not perfect but I hope you like it anyways...
Joey
--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org<marketing%2Bhelp@libreoffice.org>for instructions on how
to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Logo Enhancements · Graham Lauder
Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Logo Enhancements · John Baer
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.