Of course, improving features and UX are musts, but adoption is totally
connected to awareness.
I think the largest hold back is the adoption of the Oasis document
formats.
i a manner of speaking yes -
If the opendoc formats were accepted then there would be fair
competition. We will have some influence in marketing and if our
approach is coordinated we could probably get a little more of LibO
penetration in N. America.
We just need to keep in mind that it is not just Libo that we are
advocating but also the Oasis formats.
Complete - perhaps - agreement.
IMO the problem today could be stated as:
An overwhelming number of existing files exist in non-standard formats.
So one - advance the use of:
- Honest well documented and recognized file (data in general) formats.
- a particular standard, ODF.
The efforts should express strong commitment to, support of and
advancement of the ODF, from a marketing perspective I would say that
could be (should be IMO) 100% across the board. I would be hard pressed
to see producing some marketing item for LibreOffice or TDF that did
have some reference to ODF. Depending on the use or the item, the
audience intended, which specific subject is more prominent would
certainly change, Libo - ODF, TDF - Libo - ODF... yes?
Anyway - my thought on that at the moment, for whatever it's worth.
Best wishes,
Drew
--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-marketing] LibO in Business (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.