Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Cosmetic changes?

The "fair" way of automating the solution of 
this problem would encompass analysing the 
differences between the former and the new 
variants of source. Only the differences beyond 
the source grammar (!) and punctuation 
(including technical use -- for macro vars and 
such) should ever be marked as requiring 
revision (fuzzy). Same for the simple moves of 
strings from one part of source set to another.

Technical use of punctuation should also be 
auto-corrected, to the point of extending the 
process to translations.

All this, however, doesn't have any grounding in 
the current technological setup of OOO 
localisation, as far as I know it.

Yury

On 12/14/2014 04:04 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

> It sounds like there is scope for a lot of automation.  There might already
> be ways of doing it.
...

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted