2011.12.17 13:55, Sérgio Marques rašė:
One thing that would also be useful is the ability of ignore accelerators.
If one wants to find Open and the word is O~pen, the second won´t appear
on the search.
This is definitely annoying and contra producing. This feature is a must
have for search function. What do You guys think about it?
I think this is already filed as
Yes, I´ve already saw this entry but I think that it´s the opposite. The
title says " Ensure that searching in Pootle *takes accelerators into
account" *(my bold)
With this title I guess (don´t know for sure) that the accelerator must be
taken in order to achieve results. What I meant was " Ensure that
searching in Pootle *don´t* take accelerators into account"
So when I write Open, O~pen; Op~en and Ope~n appear in search. Or am I
getting this the wrong way?
I think that bug is about both: searching with an accelerator ("O~pen")
and finding strings with accelerators when searching without them (your
case). That bug needs some noise though, I guess... :)
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy