Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


One thing that would also be useful is the ability of ignore accelerators.
 If one wants to find Open and the word is O~pen, the second won´t appear
on the search.

This is definitely annoying and contra producing. This feature is a must
have for search function. What do You guys think about it?


I think this is already filed as
http://bugs.locamotion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327 ?




Hi Rimas

Yes, I´ve already saw this entry but I think that it´s the opposite. The
title says " Ensure that searching in Pootle *takes accelerators into
account" *(my bold)

With this title I guess (don´t know for sure) that the accelerator must be
taken in order to achieve results. What I meant was  " Ensure that
searching in Pootle *don´t* take accelerators into account"

So when I write Open, O~pen; Op~en and Ope~n appear in search. Or am I
getting this the wrong way?
-- 
Sérgio Marques

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.