On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 20:50, Rimas Kudelis <email@example.com> wrote:
2010.11.11 13:21, Aron Xu rašė:
Yes there is already a zh-hans item on that page. I'm not sure whether
we'd change it to zh_CN, because in glibc our language code is zh_CN,
and Mozilla use zh-CN. "zh-hans" is the non-official form to express
the combination of zh_CN and zh_SC, similarly "zh-trans" is for zh_TW
Dunno where you took that info from. zh-Hans (means Chinese in Han script
Simplified variant) is an official code from BCP47, which should be
preferred to zh-CN (Chinese in China).
Similarly, zh-Hant (Chinese in Han script Traditional variant) are preferred
to zh-TW and zh-HK.
Not all environments are already using these new codes, but in general, the
direction of movement is towards them, not from them. For example, Apple and
Microsoft have introduced them in their products recently.
Regardless of said above, I'm quite positive that we should take OS
expectations into account, and if zh-Han* locale codes aren't recognised by
Linux, our Linux packages should probably use older, recognised locale
I'm not so familiar about BCP 47 but I heard it was designed for
Internet application usage (such as HTML). So I agree to use it in our
wiki and other web documentations.
But for the software, I think we are using the ISO 639-1/2 in most
cases. Lists of languages in these two ISO standards are  and .
I think LO is a general desktop application suit and should follow a
standard that is well accepted, there won't be a better choice than
using ISO 639-1/2, which is compatible (or almost compatible) to most
platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux and other *nix variants).
BCP 47 is used in OOo (correct me if I'm wrong!), but I don't think
it's a wise choice because we have to first map ISO 639 codes to
BCP-47 for we use gettext have i18n support, then we have to map BCP
47 back to Unix locales (which is almost ISO 639 codes) on most *nix
platforms. Such a process is complicated.
Language code usage of software are in a mess. Chinese on Windows, for
example, we can find:
* zh_CN (ISO 639-1) for Windows itself (as in );
* zh-Hans (BCP 47) in Vista and .NET 2.0;
* zh-CHS which should be replaced by zh-Hans but still being widely
used till even today because of Windows XP;
* zho (ISO 639-2) are being used in some Microsoft documents as well.
There is no doubt that we should follow ISO 639-1 because all
standards mentioned above are based on it. For languages that do not
have an ISO 639-1 code, I suggest we use ISO 639-2 so we can easily
use gettext and support *nix systems, and map the codes to respective
platforms (Windows, Mac, etc) if necessary.
E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy