Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2017 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:23:23AM +0000, Kaganski Mike wrote:
I use +1 for that in my own patches; it indicates that others' review is awaited.

Please dont do that:

A patch in gerrit by DEFAULT is asking for review. No further action needed.

A patch in gerrit that is marked by the author with +2 has passed review and
thus needs no further review (aka is only waiting on the 'verified' by CI).

So if you submit a patch to gerrit you by default already ask for review.
Please dont do fancy things with it, if that is what you want. If you _dont_
want your patch reviewed (which obviously only can happen if you are allowed to
push directly to master anyway), you can self-mark your change with Code-Review
+2.

If your patch isnt yet ready to be reviewed (and you just want to put it
somewhere as backup or to discuss it), please use drafts:

 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit/SubmitPatch#Submitting_patches_as_drafts

For reviewers, here is a helpful query:

 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/status:open+-label:Code-Review%253E1+-ownerin:Committers

It lists all the patches that arent marked as Code-Review +2 and arent owned by
someone with commit access to master anyway. Those are the changes generally
needing review.

Best,

Bjoern

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.