On 1/3/2017 1:03 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:23:23AM +0000, Kaganski Mike wrote:
I use +1 for that in my own patches; it indicates that others' review is awaited.
Please dont do that:
A patch in gerrit by DEFAULT is asking for review. No further action needed.
A patch in gerrit that is marked by the author with +2 has passed review and
thus needs no further review (aka is only waiting on the 'verified' by CI).
So if you submit a patch to gerrit you by default already ask for review.
Please dont do fancy things with it, if that is what you want. If you _dont_
want your patch reviewed (which obviously only can happen if you are allowed to
push directly to master anyway), you can self-mark your change with Code-Review
+2.
If your patch isnt yet ready to be reviewed (and you just want to put it
somewhere as backup or to discuss it), please use drafts:
Sometimes, a patch that was thought by me as a correct patch (ant dso was submitted for review),
turns out to need some rework; and then it goes through numerous iterations until it gets ready. I
don't expect initial (or other) reviewers to spend their time to review each iteration, and I don't
know of a way to make already submittes change s draft (except resubmitting another change, which
isn't always desirable); so when ready, I mark it "CR+1" - i.e. fine with me, but needs other's
review, with accompanying comment that now I regard it ready and ask others to do actual review. As
gerrit explicitly tells that it's what CR+1 means, I don't think it's a fancy thing.
--
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.