Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

What would be nice i think is being able to respond to the patch set which
is on gerrit via email, like you can do with bugzilla no?


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Thomas Arnhold <thomas-libo@arnhold.org>wrote:

> On 02.05.2013 17:39, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>
> > If we remove all the [PATCH] from the ML, what is left ? a
> > > dev-discuss list ?
> > >
> > >  It is already now the case that there is a disconnect between
> > discussing code, or a concrete problem, and the subsequent gerrit
> > patch submission (case in point: 
> > https://gerrit.libreoffice.**org/3699<https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3699>
> > ,
> > https://gerrit.libreoffice.**org/3698<https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3698>and Noel Grandin's 
> > conversion
> > operators for UNO thread), I'm very hesitant to widen that gap.
> >
> > Devil's advocate question: with that two-list proposal, where to
> > discuss a given patch? ;)
>
> Hm right. Given the current state that gerrit patches are only "dumped" on
> the ML a second list seems reasonable. But Norberts and Lionels arguments
> are right, there is a need for discussion of that patches which is not
> possible at the moment.
>
> Thomas
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org <LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreoffice<http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice>



-- 
Jonathan Aquilina